I can’t help but remember Google Glass and the great privacy freakout of 2013.
And no, I’m not talking about Google getting more data from people. I’m talking about the public worried about what the people wearing Google Glass would do with the data.
Search and discovery would work just fine without the ads. Our satisfaction with what we bought would be at least as good if organic search simply highlighted the best match.
Ads on Amazon are no different than ads in the supermarket; buy this instead of that. The Ads have nothing to do with satisfaction.
In a complaint filed on Tuesday, the Department of Justice accuses the fintech founder of “falsely and dramatically inflating” the number of clients her startup served to “fraudulently induce” JPMorgan Chase into acquiring the company.
I mean, really though, shouldn’t JPMorgan Chase have done a better job of research before shelling out $175 million dollars for a startup?
Is this really worth taxpayer funds to prosecute?
If any institution can absorb $175 million dollars, it’s surely JPMorgan Chase.
Police, police unions and pro-police organizations will always tell you the answer to crime, as in having less crime, is more police, but that is not the truth. More police leads to more crime because the police have to justify their presence.
Nobody wants more police in their neighborhood. Except the police. They always want more police.
*Note, I have no way to validate the image is accurate and it may be a joke image: That does not change my opinion though.